The SDL forums have moved to discourse.libsdl.org.
This is just a read-only archive of the previous forums, to keep old links working.


SDL Forum Index
SDL
Simple Directmedia Layer Forums
Can SDL2 still use the Linux Framebuffer?
James Lehman


Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Posts: 4
Location: Akron, Ohio USA
Hello everyone.

I have written an app that uses SDL 1.2.

LaserBoy is free and open source:
http://laserboy.org/forum/index.php?topic=10.0

It's pretty simple. All it really needs is a bitmapped screen area and keyboard events.

One of the things I really like about SDL 1.2 is that it can get to a bitmapped screen in many different ways.

My app runs (and looks) exactly the same in Windows, Mac OSX, Linux with X, *plus* it runs in a native Linux console, taking the whole screen via the Linux Framebuffer.

It runs very nicely in the console of the Raspberry Pi.

Is this still possible with SDL2?

Thanks so much. Have a great day!

James. Smile
Can SDL2 still use the Linux Framebuffer?
Sam Lantinga


Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 1765
The framebuffer console isn't supported, but SDL 2.0.1 natively supports the Raspberry Pi. :)


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:24 AM, James Lehman wrote:
Quote:
Hello everyone.

I have written an app that uses SDL 1.2.

LaserBoy is free and open source:
http://laserboy.org/forum/index.php?topic=10.0

It's pretty simple. All it really needs is a bitmapped screen area and keyboard events.

One of the things I really like about SDL 1.2 is that it can get to a bitmapped screen in many different ways.

My app runs (and looks) exactly the same in Windows, Mac OSX, Linux with X, *plus* it runs in a native Linux console, taking the whole screen via the Linux Framebuffer.

It runs very nicely in the console of the Raspberry Pi.

Is this still possible with SDL2?

Thanks so much. Have a great day!

James.


_______________________________________________
SDL mailing list

http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org

Re: Can SDL2 still use the Linux Framebuffer?
James Lehman


Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Posts: 4
Location: Akron, Ohio USA
Sam Lantinga wrote:
The framebuffer console isn't supported, but SDL 2.0.1 natively supports the Raspberry Pi. Smile


Oh! That's kind-of a bummer.

I really liked the fact that I could run my app with no window manager. It runs really fast that way.

I wonder if there is any consideration about adding the ability for SDL2 to connect directly to the Linux Framebuffer.

My main interest in migrating from 1.2 to 2.0 is that I noticed that SDL2 would allow me to stream up to 8 channels of audio to a Dolby 7.1 sound device, plus I don't want to be attached to a platform that is out of date and no longer supported.

Anyway... Thank you for your reply.

James.
Can SDL2 still use the Linux Framebuffer?
Andre D
Guest

SDL2 uses opengl or other hardware accelerated renderers now,  It should be a LOT faster than 1.2 even with X in the "middle".


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:12 PM, James Lehman wrote:
Quote:



Sam Lantinga wrote:

The framebuffer console isn't supported, but SDL 2.0.1 natively supports the Raspberry Pi.





Oh! That's kind-of a bummer.

I really liked the fact that I could run my app with no window manager. It runs really fast that way.

I wonder if there is any consideration about adding the ability for SDL2 to connect directly to the Linux Framebuffer.

My main interest in migrating from 1.2 to 2.0 is that I noticed that SDL2 would allow me to stream up to 8 channels of audio to a Dolby 7.1 sound device, plus I don't want to be attached to a platform that is out of date and no longer supported.

Anyway... Thank you for your reply.

James.


_______________________________________________
SDL mailing list

http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org

Re: Can SDL2 still use the Linux Framebuffer?
James Lehman


Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Posts: 4
Location: Akron, Ohio USA
Andre D wrote:
SDL2 uses opengl or other hardware accelerated renderers now,  It should be a LOT faster than 1.2 even with X in the "middle".


Well.... I'm not quite sure I'm ready for that!

LaserBoy creates a 3D vector art space made of signed short integers. Data is stored that way in the open standard for laser vector art file format (ILDA) and that is also the exact same way the data gets exported to time formatted multi-channel wave files that contain the control signals for the laser projector.

So I do all the memory modeling and math in Generic C++ for 3D to 2D vector display and vector to raster translations.

In a nutshell, I make a screen sized bitmap in memory and blast that to the screen whenever there is a keyboard event.

All of the line plotting and text rendering is done in my own code into the bitmap memory.

I'm not sure how I would do this in OpenGL. I've never used it!

LaserBoy started out as an application on top of a Linux Framebuffer API that I also wrote.

SDL 1.2 gave me a VERY EASY migration route to be able to compile one single code set and get it to work exactly the same on all relevant systems.

The fact that LaserBoy was designed to run in the Linux Console is what gave it the characteristics and style that it has.

James. Smile
Can SDL2 still use the Linux Framebuffer?
Andre D
Guest

SDL still provides a surface abstraction which does all the magic in the backend.  Should be a black box port from your perspective.


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:40 PM, James Lehman wrote:
Quote:



Andre D wrote:

SDL2 uses opengl or other hardware accelerated renderers now,  It should be a LOT faster than 1.2 even with X in the "middle".





Well.... I'm not quite sure I'm ready for that!

LaserBoy creates a 3D vector art space made of signed short integers. Data is stored that way in the open standard for laser vector art file format (ILDA) and that is also the exact same way the data gets exported to time formatted multi-channel wave files that contain the control signals for the laser projector.

So I do all the memory modeling and math in Generic C++ for 3D to 2D vector display and vector to raster translations.

In a nutshell, I make a screen sized bitmap in memory and blast that to the screen whenever there is a keyboard event.

All of the line plotting and text rendering is done in my own code into the bitmap memory.

I'm not sure how I would do this in OpenGL. I've never used it!

LaserBoy started out as an application on top of a Linux Framebuffer API that I also wrote.

SDL 1.2 gave me a VERY EASY migration route to be able to compile one single code set and get it to work exactly the same on all relevant systems.

The fact that LaserBoy was designed to run in the Linux Console is what gave it the characteristics and style that it has.

James.


_______________________________________________
SDL mailing list

http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org

Can SDL2 still use the Linux Framebuffer?
Joseph Carter


Joined: 20 Sep 2013
Posts: 279
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 09:12:04PM +0000, James Lehman wrote:
Quote:
Sam Lantinga wrote:
Quote:
The framebuffer console isn't supported, but SDL 2.0.1 natively supports the Raspberry Pi. Smile

Oh! That's kind-of a bummer.

I really liked the fact that I could run my app with no window manager. It runs really fast that way.

I wonder if there is any consideration about adding the ability for SDL2 to connect directly to the Linux Framebuffer.

My main interest in migrating from 1.2 to 2.0 is that I noticed that SDL2 would allow me to stream up to 8 channels of audio to a Dolby 7.1 sound device, plus I don't want to be attached to a platform that is out of date and no longer supported.

Anyway... Thank you for your reply.

It should work with EGL on the Pi, which doesn't require X.

Joseph

_______________________________________________
SDL mailing list

http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org
Can SDL2 still use the Linux Framebuffer?
Ryan C. Gordon
Guest

Quote:
I wonder if there is any consideration about adding the ability for SDL2
to connect directly to the Linux Framebuffer.

This is something that could be re-added. I think it could be useful for
special cases (low-end embedded device that understands it only gets a
software renderer). It would be really painful to try and do complicated
rendering on it, though.

That being said, for your use case--blasting a prerendered buffer of
pixels to the screen--you can do that with SDL2 on the Raspberry Pi with
an equivalent to the framebuffer console...behind the scenes, SDL will
upload the pixels to an OpenGL ES texture and draw a quad with those
pixels, but it looks like fbcon (more or less) to your app.

Might even be faster than fbcon on the Pi? I'd be curious to see.

Anyhow, get the latest SDL2 and read this...

https://wiki.libsdl.org/MigrationGuide#Video

...specifically, this section...

https://wiki.libsdl.org/MigrationGuide#If_your_game_just_wants_to_get_fully-rendered_frames_to_the_screen

--ryan.


_______________________________________________
SDL mailing list

http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org
Can SDL2 still use the Linux Framebuffer?
Sik


Joined: 26 Nov 2011
Posts: 905
2013/10/24, Ryan C. Gordon:
Quote:
This is something that could be re-added. I think it could be useful for
special cases (low-end embedded device that understands it only gets a
software renderer). It would be really painful to try and do complicated
rendering on it, though.

Dunno, as long as you don't go crazy and your resolution isn't very
high (I'm not sure I'd try above 640×480 for anything interactive,
maybe 1024×768 for not-so-demanding stuff) the software renderer
should do just fine. In such a low-end embedded device chances are
you're more likely to use it for an UI than anything else, and at that
it'd be pretty useful.
_______________________________________________
SDL mailing list

http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org
Re: Can SDL2 still use the Linux Framebuffer?
James Lehman


Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Posts: 4
Location: Akron, Ohio USA
I really like the fact that there is no difference in the code or the way the app needs to be compiled or run to make it work in the Linux Framebuffer.

I think it's really amazing when it can automatically detect that X is not running and use the Framebuffer in console mode.

Maybe I'm old-school, but When I use a Linux machine I am almost always in the console.

James.