 |
ISO: Mac OS X build help -- Re: [annc] Tux Paint 0.9.22 rele |  |
|
Vance, Michael
Guest
|
|
Bill! I will do this for you.
m. -----Original Message----- From: SDL [mailto:] On Behalf Of Bill Kendrick Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 4:53 PM To: SDL Subject: [SDL] ISO: Mac OS X build help -- Re: [annc] Tux Paint 0.9.22 released On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:48:28AM -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote:
So it's now 7 months later, and no one has helped build the OS X version. It _should_ be trivial, since a lot of work was put into the codebase right before 0.9.22 was released. In fact, a beta of 0.9.22 was made available to users of Mac OS X 10.9-and-later, a few months earlier, to satisfy people's need for a version of Tux Paint that works on the newer versions of OS X. Basically, you should be able to download the source .tar.gz from http://www.tuxpaint.org/download/source/ and [do whatever one does to build for OS X], and that's about it...! No code changes should be required. (Don't work off of CVS, since that's been changed a bit since 0.9.22 was released last August, and we're also looking into (1) switching to SDL 2, and (2) switching to Git) Any takers!? Thanks in advance! -bill! _______________________________________________ SDL mailing list http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org _______________________________________________ SDL mailing list http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
,
|
ISO: Mac OS X build help -- Re: [annc] Tux Paint 0.9.22 rele | |
|
Bill Kendrick
Guest
|
|
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 08:53:40PM +0000, Vance, Michael wrote:
I dunno... can I trust your abilities?  (I'm joking!)
-bill! _______________________________________________ SDL mailing list http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
ISO: Mac OS X build help -- Re: [annc] Tux Paint 0.9.22 rele | |
|
Sagara Wijetunga
Guest
|
|
Hi Bill
I noted your software is GPL licensed, which is considered too restrictive. Consider a more liberal BSD license, people may help you. http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause Example: https://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html Cheers Sagara On Friday, March 27, 2015 2:56 AM, Jeffrey Carpenter wrote: May the gods have mercy on you if you seriously would ever go with a Pentium II for a build bot! OK, maybe somewhere within the range of acceptable purely as a front-end, depending on your required setup, but I dunno, it still sounds a bit masochist to me :<o If you were to so happen to already have a compile farm of Pentium IIs setup that ran in parallel, then yeah, sure, it may be in the realm of sane to do this without an **insane** increase of upkeep costs, but otherwise … no dice! While it is true that the build bot’s build time isn’t necessarily a factor that you care about so much in day to day use, you will quickly find that it matters very much when things **aren’t** building / working and you need to debug these issues from that same build bot instance. (This is without considering the unit test run times :-/). Ryan isn’t joking when he says that the setup and upkeep is not trivial! Maintenance is a real bitch. Cheers, Jeffrey Carpenter _______________________________________________SDL mailinghttp://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||